Public Damage Comparison V2
Damage comparison data for two items across multiple combos, detailing the HP left after each trial. The sheet includes columns for ITEM A's DAMAGE and ITEM B's DAMAGE, with averages calculated for each item. Notable trials show varying damage outputs, with ITEM A averaging 1541.8 damage and ITEM B averaging 1388.3. The total damage for ITEM A is recorded at 15418, while ITEM B totals 13883, providing a clear overview of performance across different combos.
Content article
In this analysis, we compare the damage dealt by two items across three trials, focusing on their effectiveness against a dummy with a total health pool of 2388.
In the first trial, the results show that Item A delivered an average damage of 1541.8, while Item B dealt slightly less, with an average of 1388.3. The total damage inflicted over the six combos in this trial amounted to 15418 for Item A and 13883 for Item B. The combos varied in effectiveness; for instance, Combo 1 resulted in HP left after the combo of 1693 for Item A and 1656 for Item B, while Combo 6 saw HP left at 1635 for Item A and a full recovery to 2388 for Item B, indicating a potential difference in hit effectiveness or the nature of the combos used.
Moving to Trial 2, both items performed identically, with each combo resulting in no damage to the dummy, maintaining its HP at 2388 throughout all ten combos. This led to an average damage of 2388 for both Item A and Item B, with a total damage output of 23880 for each item across the trial.
Trial 3 mirrored the results of Trial 2, with both items again inflicting no damage. The dummy's HP remained at 2388 for all combos, resulting in the same average and total damage figures as seen in Trial 2, maintaining an average damage of 2388 and a total damage of 23880 for both items.
When we look at the overall performance across all trials, the average damage for all trials combined stands at approximately 2105.93 for Item A and 2054.77 for Item B. The total damage inflicted across all trials amounts to 63178 for Item A and 61643 for Item B, illustrating a consistent trend where Item A generally outperformed Item B in the first trial, while both items were equally ineffective in the subsequent trials.