Performance Management System - Vendor Comparison

    Vendor Comparison Matrix for Performance Management System, comparing 5 vendors across 15 features. Use this template during vendor calls to grade them accordingly and combine data for comparison. Visit https://peoplegoal.com for more information.

    6/30/2025
    8 views
    performance management
    vendor comparison
    requirements analysis
    vendor evaluation
    template
    This spreadsheet is hosted on Google Sheets. Open in Google Sheets to edit directly.
    Content article

    A comparison of five vendors across fifteen features reveals insights into their performance management systems. The first vendor, PeopleGoal, scored a total of 21 points, with individual feature scores ranging from 1 to 3. Specifically, PeopleGoal received a score of 3 for Feature 1, Feature 2, Feature 9, and Feature 10, indicating strong performance in these areas. However, it scored lower on Features 6, 7, and 8, each receiving a score of 1, and Features 3, 4, and 5, which were rated at 2.

    The matrix also includes placeholders for four additional vendors, labeled Vendor2, Vendor3, Vendor4, and Vendor5, but these entries currently have no scores assigned, indicating that their performance data has yet to be evaluated.

    In assessing the importance of features, the spreadsheet categorizes requirements into three classifications: "Optional" features score 0, "Nice to Have" features score 1, and "Must Have" features score 2. The feature requirements are assigned values that reflect their significance, with Requirement/Feature 1, Requirement/Feature 2, and Requirement/Feature 3 classified as "Must Have," each receiving a value of 2. Requirement/Feature 4 and Requirement/Feature 5 are considered "Nice to Have," with a value of 1, while Requirement/Feature 6 through Requirement/Feature 8 also fall into the "Nice to Have" category. Requirement/Feature 9 and Requirement/Feature 10 are deemed "Optional," scoring 0.

    To facilitate the grading of vendors, the spreadsheet outlines a grading scale where a vendor that does not meet a requirement receives a score of 0, a vendor that meets a requirement partially scores 1, a vendor that meets a requirement scores 2, and a vendor that exceeds a requirement scores 3. This grading system is designed to provide a clear and structured evaluation of each vendor's capabilities against the specified requirements.

    Comments

    SpreadableSheet is a platform for sharing and discovering spreadsheets. We do not own, review, or control the content of any sheets shared by users. All content is the sole responsibility of the uploader. If you have concerns about a particular sheet, please contact us.