Debate Websites Comparison
Compares various debate websites based on their Alexa rankings, features such as user debate formats, tournament availability, and additional functionalities like forums and topic customization.
Content article
A comparison of seven debate websites reveals various features and rankings that cater to different user needs. ForDebating.com does not have an Alexa Global Ranking, while Debate.org ranks 20,396, procon.org at 25,884, and Kialo.com at 91,071. CreateDebate.com has a ranking of 319,852, and both debategraph.org and forandagainst.com fall behind significantly with rankings of 1.5 million and 1.8 million, respectively. In terms of US rankings, Debate.org performs best at 6,672, followed closely by procon.org at 4,398. Kialo.com is at 20,862, while CreateDebate.com is much lower at 210,949, with debategraph.org and forandagainst.com ranking at 725,195 and not available, respectively.
When it comes to user engagement, ForDebating.com and Debate.org both support 1v1 debates, while the other sites do not. In terms of 2v2 debates, ForDebating.com is the only site that offers this feature. Multiple rounds of debate are available on ForDebating.com and Debate.org, but the other sites do not provide this option. The Elo ranking system is fully integrated into ForDebating.com, while Debate.org offers a limited version that does not function correctly. The remaining sites either do not have an Elo system or have it in a limited capacity.
Debate topics can be random or custom on ForDebating.com, while the other sites do not offer this flexibility. Tournaments are also a feature exclusive to ForDebating.com. Both ForDebating.com and Debate.org have forums, but the other sites do not. Debate.org provides forum-style debating, while ForDebating.com and CreateDebate.com have limited forum-style options. The community-driven aspect is strong across all sites, with ForDebating.com, Debate.org, CreateDebate.com, debategraph.org, and forandagainst.com being community-driven, whereas procon.org does not have this feature.
In terms of content, ForDebating.com, Debate.org, and CreateDebate.com allow users to express opinions and conduct polls, while procon.org and debategraph.org do not. Voting mechanisms vary, with ForDebating.com offering two types, Debate.org using a seven-point scale, and CreateDebate.com allowing users to vote based on their points on topics. Ads are present on ForDebating.com, Debate.org, CreateDebate.com, and forandagainst.com, while procon.org and debategraph.org do not have ads.
Lastly, the websites differ in their approach to professionally researched topics. Procon.org stands out as the only site that offers topics that are professionally researched, while the others do not provide this feature.